🔥

여성 UA 플라이-바이 2.0 쇼츠

247
Style # 1350196
₩24,500 ₩35,000
키: 사이즈: 핏: Loose
사이즈 & 핏 가이드
제한된 수량으로 인해 한 분당 20개만 허용됩니다.
이 제품은 장바구니에 추가할 수 없습니다
키: 사이즈: 핏: Loose
여성 UA 플라이-바이 2.0 쇼츠

다른 보기

제품 DNA

쇼츠와 관련해서 Under Armour는 전략적인 메쉬, 열쇠 포켓, 반사되는 디테일 등 모든 것을 고려했습니다.여러분은 더 빨리 더 멀리 달리는 것에만 집중할 수 있도록 말입니다.
  • Loose: 편안한 착용감
  • 가벼운 우븐 소재가 탁월한 편안함과 내구성을 제공합니다.
  • 소재가 땀을 흡수하고 매우 빠르게 건조됩니다.
  • 통기성이 뛰어난 메쉬 패널이 과도한 열을 배출해 줍니다.
  • 내장된 브리프가 커버력을 높여줍니다.
  • 매우 편안하고 부드러운 니트 허리밴드에는 내부 조절끈이 있습니다.
  • 모양을 잡아주는 크로스오버 밑단이 매끄러운 룩을 연출합니다.
  • 스타일 #: 1350196
  • 반사되는 로고가 돋보입니다.
  • 인심: 8.89cm
  • 100% 폴리에스테르
  • 수입산
  • 비슷한 색상의 세탁물과 함께 찬물에 세탁하십시오.
  • 필요한 경우 비염소계 표백제만 사용하십시오.
  • 건조기 사용 시 낮은 온도에서 건조하십시오.
  • 다림질하지 마십시오.
  • 섬유유연제를 사용하지 마십시오.
  • 드라이클리닝하지 마십시오.
공유

리뷰 요약

247 개의 리뷰
3.8
57% 리뷰를 작성한 사람들의 추천

사이즈

사이즈가 작음 사이즈가 큼

편안함

최소 최대

퍼포먼스

최소 최대

Cute buuuut

I LOVE the color! But they are SEE THROUGH! 😫 I for sure could never wear these in public.

Please bring back the POCKETS!

I wear these shorts almost every day in the hot months. I bought them years ago and have enough pairs for now, but when they wear out, I need the pockets back, please!

NO POCKETS????

I'm genuinely curious. Do you all have some kind of internal audit where you discuss changes to your design? Do you talk to consumers AT ALL? Was there a pocket-hating consumer focus group? What made you eliminate the pockets? Besides cost. I'd pay a few more dollars for pockets. And no, the tiny key pocket is not a pocket. I have had to resort to shady corners of the internet to buy the original fly-by second hand. I've bought 7 pairs of those. (so a couple hundred dollars that did not go to your company because this version doesn't have pockets.) I'm genuinely curious about the rationale, so if you respond with that, it would be awesome. I have one pair of these, and they're okay, but no pockets is a bummer.

좋아요

세일시 저렴하게 구매했어요 현재는 추워서 레깅스 위에 입고 있는데 길이감도 마냥 짧지 않아서 여름엔 단독으로 입어도 예쁠거 같아요

My favorite shorts

I absolutely love these shorts. They fit so comfortable and can be worn for everyday use. They fit just right and are very comfortable. These are my new favorite shorts now!

No pockets

The first version of these shorts was much better. They had pockets and fit better on my butt/legs

Plainly Inferior to Previous Fly By

I am so disappointed with the changes made to these shorts. The original Fly By shorts had front pockets and a better fit: looser around the leg, higher rise, thicker and more comfortable waistband. The Fly By 2.0 shorts also have fabric that comes down lower between your legs, which, let's be honest, really just means more fabric bunching in your crotch while you run. Why in the world would I prefer my running shorts to fit in any of these ways? I implore Under Armour to bring back the originals, they were my favorite, I am desperate.

Want pockets back!!!

The old generations of this shorts have POCKETS and BUILT-IN BRIEF, which makes them the perfect shorts for running and tennis/pickleball. I highly recommended them to my friends because of the pockets. Please bring them back, and keep the brief too.

Same size, different fit

I purchased two pairs both medium in size. One pair fit okay but the other was so tight in the hips I can’t wear them. Why is that? I miss the old style with the pockets! Please bring them back. Why change what’s good?!?

Great shorts

These shorts are amazing but they took the pockets away! Bring back the pockets!!